Join us in the fight to abolish slavery and human trafficking

Press release 2 December 2016

Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers
2 December, 2016 - PRESS RELEASE
Phone: +46 70 725 19 17 / Email: info@shrl.eu


Join us in the fight to abolish slavery and human trafficking

Today, the 2 December, is the International Day of the Abolition of Slavery. The 2 December 1949 the United Nations Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others was adopted.

According to Global Slavery Index, 45.8 million people are enslaved in the world today. Most of the victims are women and children.

Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers are currently representing several victims of human trafficking in judicial proceedings. This short film tells the story of some of them.

 

Josephine, a 28 years old mother that was a victim of sex trafficking and her little daughter, Patricia, 6 year old. The traffickers put a gun against Patricia’s head, lit cigarettes and burned her body and forced her to watch while they raped her mother and beat her until she started bleeding. The little girl was so traumatized that she lost the ability to eat, talk and play and she had to use diapers again. We fight for their protection and their freedom.

Maria, mother of twins, victim of sex trafficking. Maria was exploited as a sex slave in Europe for ten years. She tried to escape several times but the traffickers found her every time. They tatooed her body to show that they owned her. Maria was then subjected to even more violence, massive threats and abuse. She fled to Sweden and gave birth to twins. The traffickers have threatened to take her children. We fight for their protection and their freedom.

Ana, sold to forced prostitution when she was 16 years old. The traffickers kidnapped Ana, armed with guns, in front of her 11-year old sister. She was subjected to severe violence and abuse and was drugged by the traffickers, who threatened that they would kill her and sell her organs. The traffickers are part of organized crime and corruption impede prosecution. Ana´s mental health is at a critical stage and she has suffered from panic attacks and suicidal thoughts. We fight for Ana and her sister, for their protection and their freedom

Join us in the fight to #endhumantrafficking and #abolishslavery in our time.


For more information contact

Ruth Nordström, Chief Lawyer SHRL
Email: info@shrl.eu or ruth.nordstrom@shrl.eu
Phone: +46 70-725 19 17

Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers is a Non-Governmental Organisation dedicated to the promotion and protection of human rights and human dignity in Scandinavia and Europe.

 

Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers - Defending Human Rights and Freedoms

Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers – Defending Human Rights and Freedoms

Dr. Denis Mukwege winner of the Scandinavian Human Dignity Award 2016

Press release October 17, 2016

Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers
October 17, 2016 - PRESS RELEASE
Phone: +46 70 725 19 17 / Email: info@shrl.eu


Dr. Denis Mukwege winner of the Scandinavian Human Dignity Award 2016

The Scandinavian Human Dignity Award is presented annually by the Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers & Committe, to a person or an organization which has made a special contribution to human rights, all of which derive from the inherent dignity of the human person and are essential for his free and full development.

The 2016 Award winner is Dr. Denis Mukwege, Medical Director at the Panzi Hospital in Eastern Congo, where thousands of women and children that are victims of sexual violence and human trafficking, have been treated. Dr. Mukwege is world famous for his treatment to victims of rape in the conflict-ridden Congo and he has challenged both the UN and the international community and has become a spokesperson for the victims of the war in Congo.

"The Scandinavian Human Dignity Award is dedicated to Dr. Mukwege for his work to combat sexual violence and strengthen women's dignity and human rights. Dr. Mukwege gives a voice to the voiceless victims and to those who can not speak for themselves. He defends the defenseless and gives them the tools to combat the fear of violence and oppression. Dr. Mukwege has said that it is in times of crisis that every community has the greatest duty to protect human rights. His own community efforts to promote human rights and freedoms makes him a worthy winner of this year's prize," says Ruth Nordstrom, Chief Lawyer, Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers and Chairman of Scandinavian Human Rights Committee.

The Members of the Scandinavian Human Rights Committé is Professor Kjell O Leijon, Professor Emeritus Reinhold Fahlbeck, Legal Counsel Rebecca Ahlstrand, Photographer and Marketer Johan Ruden, Deacon and former Diplomat Marianne Lidskog, The Swedish Angeln in the Red Light District Elise Lindqvist, and Chief Lawyer Ruth Nordstrom.

The Award Ceremony took place at a reception in central Stockholm October 14, 2016.

Pictures for download

To Gallery

 

For more information contact

Ruth Nordström, chairman SHRL
Email: info@shrl.eu or ruth.nordstrom@shrl.eu
Phone: +46 70-725 19 17

 

Linda Steen

ON 22-26 SEPTEMBER 2016, the trial concerning Linda Steen and Sörmlands Landsting will be held at the District Court of Nyköping. Linda Steen has filed a lawsuit against Sörmland County for violation of her freedom of conscience, freedom of religion and freedom of thought and opinion under the European Convention on Human Rights, and she has claimed damages for those violations. The European Convention, which is Swedish law since 1995, gives everyone, according to article 9, the right to freedom of conscience. This article may only be restricted if it is supported by law and if it is necessary in a democratic society.

PROSTITUTION: Success of "Nordic Model" promoted to Australian politicians

By David Adams

Australian states are being urged to take a “serious look” at the approach of Sweden in addressing prostitution and to consider it as part of a raft of measures being taken across the nation to end violence against women.

Under the so-called ‘Nordic Model’ – which was introduced via legislation in Sweden in 1999 and has since been adopted in a range of other countries including Norway, Iceland, France and Canada, the buyers of sexual services are targeted instead of the prostitutes.

Last month the Australian Christian Lobby brought two Swedish experts - Ruth Nordström, president of Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers - an organisation that works to promote and protect human rights and freedoms in Europe by providing legal assistance in cases involving such issues as human trafficking and migration and asylum law, and her colleague Rebecca Ahlstrand - to Australia to discuss the approach of Sweden to the issue with politicians in a range of Australian states.

“It’s pretty basic,” Ms Nordström says of the approach, speaking to Sight during her 10 day visit last month. “If there is no demand for buying sex, there will be no prostitution. That is why is Sweden we shifted the perspective to reduce the demand for buying sex.”

In Sweden, the laws allow for a range of sanctions on the buyers of sexual services – from a summary fine up to imprisonment (although there have been no cases of the latter since the law’s introduction) and authorities say it’s led to a halving of street prostitution in the country since then.

“We also found that the legislation has become an important instrument to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, especially for those who are trafficked…for sexual purposes,” says Ms Nordström. “And we also found that this legislation has had a significant normative effect – now the majority of the Swedish population, especially young people, support the ban…”

Ms Nordström says the legislation was passed in Sweden as part of a package of measures being taken towards preventing violence against women and the approach also includes providing support services for prostitutes to leave prostitution.

“It was assumed that women in prostitution are victims of a system and this system consists of a power imbalance and it consists of gender inequality…”

She adds that it was interesting to see Australia had recently taken action at a national level to combat all forms of violence against women – “That’s exactly the same language that was used in Sweden back in the Nineties” – and adds that she believes the raft of measures being looked at should include prostitution “as a form of violence”.

The ACL support the idea. Lyle Shelton, the organisation’s managing director, says the Nordic approach has “smashed” the myth that prostitution can be harmless to women.

“Their starting point was recognising that all prostitution is violence against women, because that is what it is and they changed the law so that it became illegal for someone to purchase another person for sex – usually a man purchasing a woman – and that’s had incredible results in Sweden.”

Meanwhile, in addressing the argument that prostitution was a choice for some, Ms Nordström said that was one of the common “myths” surrounding prositution.

“I think it is very important to see that if the women in prostitution, if they don’t have any other options, if they don’t have any exit programs or they don’t really have any other choice, then it’s not their choice.”

Choice, she believes, should always be viewed in context and with the majority of women in prostitution facing poverty, violence and discrimination and often coming from a background or sexual abuse, prostitution becomes their “only choice”.

Ms Nordström notes the ‘Angel’ of Stockholm, Elise Lindqvist – who was sold as a prostitute as a young teenager but who escaped that life and now works with prostitutes in the Swedish capital’s red light district – has said that in all her years of working with prostitutes, she has not met one that wouldn’t choose another profession if they had a “real opportunity” to do so.

She says it is also important to understand that prostitution is a “class issue” with the majority of women involved in Sweden migrants. “I think we have to look at all these aspects,” she says.

And while some promote decriminalisation of prostitution – for both buyers and sellers of sex - as an answer to the issue, Ms Nordström says that the experience in Europe – where data had shown that more than 80 per cent of all human trafficking victims are trafficked into forced prostitution - showed that the Nordic model was the “most effective tool” to prevent and combat human trafficking. Decriminalisation on the other hand, she argues, would actually increase human trafficking and create more victims.

Ms Nordström believes that ultimately an international approach is needed to tackle what was a “global problem”. “ “We need to join…forces if we want to see an end to this…” she says. “This is not just a crisis for Europe – it effects the whole world.”

Criminalising sex buyers, reducing demand, trafficking and violence: Swedish human rights experts in Australia advocating for The Nordic Model

Why Australia should adopt the Nordic Model

By Melinda Tankard Reist

International lawyers, Ruth Nordstrom and Rebecca Ahlstrand, are globally recognized legal experts on the Nordic model of prostitution regulation, first established in Sweden. They have been in Australia meeting with MPs in four states advocating for the Nordic Model to be adopted here. Ruth is President and Senior Legal Counsel of Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers with experience in the Administrative Court of Uppsala Sweden and the Swedish Ministry of Justice. Rebecca is Legal Counsel for Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyer specializing in international human rights, humanitarian law, asylum law and medical law. I interviewed them while they were here.

Welcome to Australia and thanks for being here. For those not familiar with the Nordic Model, could you give a brief description of how it works? How did the Swedish criminal code come to include prostitution in its provisions? 

The Swedish Sex Purchase Act came into force in 1999 and the law criminalizes the buyer, but not the seller of sex. The Swedish law on prostitution states the following: ‘A person who obtains a casual sexual relation in return for payment, shall be sentenced for purchase of sexual service to a fine or imprisonment for at most one year.’ When this law was passed it introduced a new way of thinking as it shifted focus from the seller to the buyer. There were several objectives to this, firstly to make a clear statement that women are not commodities to be sold or bought, but that women are equal to men. Secondly it was a way to reduce the demand for prostitution. Simply put, if there is no demand, prostitution will automatically be reduced. Just the fact that a buyer can get caught and have a letter from the police sent home to his family has been found to have a deterring effect on sex buyers.

Can you describe the effort it took to see the law passed? What had to happen for it to succeed and how long did it take?

The law was part of a larger Government Bill concerning violence against women. The Bill included many different proposals in different sectors and prostitution was amongst these. Already in the 70s the issue of criminalizing prostitution was raised and a big inquiry was made into the issue of prostitution. A proposal was presented in the beginning of the 80s, but the proposal only included suggestions on social measures and some legal amendments to reduce prostitution.

Already at that time, however, the inquiry found that men buying women for sexual pleasure was not compatible with the principles of individual freedom and gender equality. In a society where a man can buy a woman, respect for women is also lost. A new inquiry was made in 1993 and in a Government report from 1995 it was proposed that both selling and buying sexual services should be criminalized. However, this proposal was heavily criticized because of the criminalization of the prostitute and was never implemented. A new proposal, where only the person who purchases sexual services was criminalized, based on the inquiry from 1993, was the one that ultimately was implemented.

A few surveys were made before the implementation of the Sex Purchase Act, and they showed that more than 70 percent of the population in Sweden was against the new law. However, this changed radically in a short time as the new law had an interesting impact on attitudes – all surveys after the implementation, the latest one held in 2014, have shown that more than 70 percent of the population is now for the ban on buying sex. Among women the support is as high as 85 percent and a large majority of young people also favor the ban. It took many years, around 25 years to find a solution in Sweden, but now many countries are following Sweden’s example, the latest country being France.

France adopted the Nordic approach after a few years of debating the issue. Many countries in the world are waking up to the fact that the sex industry and trafficking in human beings are growing global problems connected with serious organized crime and have to be counteracted in different ways. A law that criminalizes buyers and helps reduce demand is one of the important steps to stop violence against women.

Did Swedish politicians expect at that time that this legislative model would be taken up by the number of countries who have since adopted it? Can you describe your feelings after the law was recently adopted in France?

When the Sex Purchase Act was implemented in Sweden in 1999, it was a signal and an important statement to other countries in the world, but few could by then foresee how far the legislative model would reach. Year 2014, the Council of Europe Report on Prostitution, Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery in Europe, recommended all other European Member states to seriously consider adopting the Swedish/Nordic model, which of course was a very important step forward.

When France had finally adopted the new law to criminalize sex purchase, we spoke with the Swedish “Angel in the Red Light District” who started to shout for joy. We often hear that it is only right wing/conservatives that would support any limits on the sex industry. That is a myth and not based on facts. In France, two Socialist MP’s, Maud Olivier and Bruno Le Roux were the two leading figures in this process and the Socialist were also supported by the Greens. In Sweden, the legislative model was introduced by the Social democrats, but today it has broad support within all the major political parties.

What are you doing at present to see the model taken up in other countries?

We are currently part of several EU projects concerning education and promotion of the Nordic model on prostitution and trafficking to other countries in Europe. Through the EU projects, representatives from several other EU countries participate and we will also arrange judicial training and release projects focused on reducing the demand for sexual services.

We often hear from those with vested interests that the Swedish model ‘doesn’t’ work’ and drives prostitution underground. How effective has the model been in reducing crime, trafficking, and protecting women?

When the law was introduced street prostitution was very soon reduced by half. The following years there was a steady increase in street prostitution in Sweden’s neighboring countries, Norway and Denmark, but not in Sweden. Prostitution can never be completely underground, but if the buyers can find prostitutes, so can the police and social workers.

In the comparing research that has been made in the Nordic countries, there is nothing to suggest that there is a larger underground prostitution industry in Sweden compared to other countries, quite the contrary. The estimated number of women trafficked for sexual purposes in Sweden and Finland a while back showed that Sweden had an estimate of 2-400 women who had been trafficked, while Finland, where prostitution is legal, the number was significantly higher with 15-17 000 women. Finland has a much smaller population than Sweden, which makes this number even more serious.

We strongly believe that prostituted women are in a stronger position when it’s illegal to buy sexual services, because this makes the man a criminal. Women who have worked in Germany before and after legalization, and who also worked in Sweden have stated that their experience is that men grew more violent to them as prostitutes after the legalization, because they felt entitled to having sex.

They found men to be less violent in Sweden. When the buyer is criminalized, it will give the prostitute a stronger position because the buyer knows he is committing a crime and the prostitute will have the police and the social authorities on her side. Through the European police cooperation, Interpol, undercover work and interviews with victims of human trafficking, there have been indications that criminal groups consider Sweden as a less attractive country for trafficking because it is riskier and less profitable.

The French law includes provision of “exit routes” through programs and support for those women who wish to leave the system, with the development of reparation and other remedies for victims of prostitution and trafficking. How essential are these programs in your view? Are you surprised that Australia has no publicly funded exit programs?

We think it’s great that France has incorporated this in the law. It’s not enough to just criminalize sex buyers, it is crucial to create opportunities for the women in prostitution to get away from the industry. Many of the girls are broken, abused, alcohol or drug addicted and suffer from a very low self-esteem. In Sweden the County Administrative Board in Stockholm was commissioned by the Government to develop an aid program for the rehabilitation of victims of trafficking and prostitution.

The mission was to strengthen and develop support with respect to the exposed situation, trauma, vulnerability and potential threats. The goal was to identify measures that were needed to ensure the person’s future through education and work, and to reduce the risk of ending up in prostitution again or of re-trafficking. Every country needs to have an action plan against trafficking which also includes funding of exit programs. Considering the great human rights abuses within human trafficking and the sex industry, it is very surprising that Australia has no publicly funded exit programs. During our visits and hearing in the Australian parliaments, we strongly recommended this.

The French law also mandates programs in educating young people and in raising public awareness that prostitution is linked to the commodification of the body as “a form of violence against women.” Is this a measure you hope would be included in passage of legislation in other countries in future?

Education on these issues is crucial and has a reducing effect on demand. The French law is very interesting in this regard. We definitely think other countries should take a close look and follow the French example. Young people are vulnerable, and there are many examples of young girls being groomed and lured into prostitution and abuse through the Internet. Education is a way to teach young people of the risks of prostitution and the abuse and violence that are associated with it. Every young person has the right to know that they are valuable and priceless and that women and their bodies are not commodities that could be bought and sold.

You have been visiting Australia and speaking with MPs here. How have they responded? Do you think Australia has a long way to go before there is political will to see the Nordic model adopted here or are you more hopeful?

Some politicians have been very positive, but we have also met some opposition. The knowledge about the Nordic Model is generally low and there are myths and rumors circulating that are not correct and therefore it is very important to bring the actual facts. There is a crystal clear link between prostitution and trafficking for sexual purposes. Millions of people are suffering; most of them are women and children. It is a global issue and we need a global strategy to combat trafficking and the exploitation of victims.

The Nordic model has proved to be an important tool to prevent and counteract the establishment of human trafficking and organized crime. Attitudes can change fast and we believe we are witnessing a trend toward the Nordic approach in Europe and other countries and we think Australia needs keep up with the rest of the world.

Nordic approach on prostitution

Breaking: The European Court of Human Rights stops deportation

Scandianvian Human Rights Lawyers
May 27, 2016 – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: info@shrl.eu


Breaking: The European Court of Human Rights stops deportation

The European Court of Human Rights has decided to prevent the Swedish applicant's deportation to Afghanistan in the case of M.H. v. Sweden. The duty judge has decided, in the interests of the parties and the proper conduct of the proceedings before it, to indicate to the Government of Sweden, under Rule 39, that the applicant should not be expelled for the duration of the proceedings before the Court.

- The applicant has, during his stay in Sweden, converted from Islam to Christianity. The execution of the expulsion would entail a violation of Article 2 and 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights, as he on a return to Afghanistan would face the death penalty, torture or inhuman and degrading treatment, said Ruth Nordstrom, Senior Legal Counsel at Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers.

- The applicant shows all the signs of having genuine Christian beliefs. He has exhausted all domestic remedies in Sweden. The Swedish authorities and courts have, at the initial determination of his asylum application, without reasonable grounds, made the assessment that his Christian beliefs are not genuine. An examination of how genuine the complainant's faith is, has not been done since before October 2013, because the Courts did not consider that any new facts had emerged in the case, says Rebecca Ahlstrand, Legal Counsel at Scandianvian Human Rights Lawyers.

- In accordance with ECtHR case F. G. v. Sweden (43611/11, G.C.., March 23, 2016) the right to manifest a person´s faith openly has to be weighed in the when states assess whether there is a risk of torture or death in the home country. The applicant had a well-founded fear of persecution because of religious beliefs and it is reasonable to assume that the applicant would be at risk of the death penalty or being subjected to corporal punishment, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, says Ruth Nordstrom.

The European Court of Human Rights may, under Rule 39 of its Rules of Court, indicate interim measures to any State party to the European Convention on Human Rights. Interim measures are urgent measures which, according to the Court’s well-established practice, apply only where there is an imminent risk of irreparable harm. Such measures are decided in connection with proceedings before the Court without prejudging any subsequent decisions on the admissibility or merits of the case in question. In the majority of cases, the applicant requests the suspension of an expulsion or an extradition. The Court grants such requests for an interim measure only on an exceptional basis, when the applicant would otherwise face a real risk of serious and irreversible harm.

The European Court Officer, Anders Månsson, has announced that the European Court has contacted the Swedish government to stop the deportation in the case of M.H. v. Sweden.

 

For more information contact:

Ruth Nordström
Senior Legal Counsel, Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers
Phone: +46-70 725 19 17
Email: ruth.nordstrom@shrl.eu

Rebecca Ahlstrand
Legal Counsel, Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers
Phone: +46–70 515 94 35

Contact:
info@shrl.eu

 

Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers is a Non-Governmental Organization dedicated to the promotion and protection of human rights and human dignity in Scandinavia and Europe. Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers implements an effective strategy of advocacy, networking and education on legal issues.

New trial regarding freedom of conscience – employment was withdrawn

After the case of Ellinor Grimmark the trial between the midwife Linda Steen and Sörmland County is now initiated.- In this case we have only claimed damages due to violation of her rights according to the European Convention on Human Rights, says Linda Steen's legal representative, Ruth Nordstrom, to the newspaper Dagen.

When Ellinor Grimmark, who, like Linda Steen, can not participate in the performance of abortions, filed her lawsuit she wanted both compensation for discrimination and damages for the violation of freedom of religion and freedom of conscience.

- Another difference is that Linda Steen actually had a contract agreement with the Sörmland County, says Ruth Nordstrom.

Would work two years after studies

The lawsuit states that Linda Steen got a contract employment at the women's clinic at Nyköping hospital in early 2014.

The employment meant that Linda Steen, who is a trained nurse, would be trained as a midwife, and that the County would pay for her education. In exchange, Linda Steen promised to work at the women's clinic for two years after completing her studies.

Withdrew the offer

A year later, when the officers of the women's clinic became aware of Linda Steen's attitude toward abortion they changed their minds and decided to withdraw the offer of a post at the clinic.

The lawsuit lists nine specific examples where Linda Steen and her representatives considers that there have been a violations of her freedom of religion and freedom of conscience under the European Convention on Human Rights, article 9.

The District Court dismissed the complaint

Recently the District Court of Jonkoping rejected Ellinor Grimmark's complaint against the Region of Jönköping. Ruth Nordstrom notes that the case also was mentioned during yesterday's oral hearing in Nyköping.

 

Do you think that your chances have increased, decreased or remained unaffected by the outcome in Jonkoping?

- There are reasons to believe that the District Court of Nykoping at least will consider the main issue – if Linda Steen’s freedom of religion and freedom of conscience have been violated according to the European Convention on Human Rights. The District Court of Jönköping never addressed those issues. At the same time, the court may very well be guided by the verdict in Jönköping.

In early January, both parties will make written submissions and after that a date for the main hearing will be set.

 

by Johannes Ottestig

Swedish Court ignores International Law protecting Freedom of Conscience

IMG_2320

Photo: SHRL

Scandianvian Human Rights Lawyers
November 12, 2015 – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: info@shrl.eu


Swedish Court ignores International Law protecting Freedom of Conscience

Judgment delivered in the Swedish Midwife Case

Jönköping, Sweden:

The Jönköping District Court ruled Thursday against midwife Ellinor Grimmark who was unjustly denied employment by three different hospitals because of her conscientious objection to abortion.

  • We regret the Court's decision. The Court decided not to examine the right of freedom of conscience according to international law and the European Convention on human rights, at all. We will discuss the judgment with our client, Ellinor Grimmark, but it is likely that we will appeal the case to the Göta Hovrätt, the Court of Appeal, says attorney Ruth Nordström, Senior Legal Counsel of Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers.

In November 2013, Höglandssjukhuset women’s clinic withdrew a job offer as a midwife from Grimmark after she explained that she could not perform abortions because of her conscientious objection and her Christian faith. The head of the maternity ward said that Grimmark “was no longer welcome to work with them” and questioned “whether a person with such views actually can become a midwife.” A few months later, Grimmark tried to obtain employment with Ryhovs women’s clinic, which told her that a “person who refuses to perform abortions does not belong at a women’s clinic”.

In January, Värnamo Hospital’s women’s clinic offered Grimmark a job but then withdrew employment because of the complaint she filed against Höglandssjukhuset in April. The head of the hospital told Grimmark that no employee was allowed to publicly take a stand against abortion.

- Ellinor Grimmark is currently working as a midwife with maternity care in Norway, where her freedom of conscience is respected. Considering the great shortage of midwives in Sweden, especially within the maternity care, it is surprising that the Health Region of Jönköping, would rather lose competent health care workers to Norway than grant them freedom of conscience. This decision contradicts the right to safe maternity health care and is not in the best interest of patients, says Ruth Nordström.

- The District Court only examined if Ellinor Grimmark was discriminated because of her religious beliefs and did not at all examine the relevant case law of the European Court. It is remarkable that the Court states that the question of freedom of conscience should only be examined if a person is not religious, says Ruth Nordström.

- Article 9 of the European Convention establishes freedom of conscience as a human right. The Convention has been implemented as Swedish law and takes precedence over national laws. The majority of the countries in Europe, protect the right to freedom of conscience in their Constitution, law or practice. In addition, health professionals right to conscience is recognized in international ethical standards of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the World Health Organization and in the International Code of Ethics for Midwives. According to Council of Europe Resolution 1763 (2010) health care professionals shall not be coerced or discriminated upon because of refusal to perform or assist in any act that could end a human life at its beginning or end, says Ruth Nordstrom.

- Freedom of conscience is a fundamental human right. To deny freedom of conscience to all health care workers in Sweden cannot be considered a measure necessary in a democratic society. Sweden has not shown in what way the country's health care system is so unique compared to the rest of Europe and neighbouring countries that it is impossible to grant Ellinor Grimmark a right to conscience, says Attorney Jörgen Olson.

Read the full judgment:

http://shrl.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/J%C3%B6nk%C3%B6pings-TR-T-1781-14-Dom-2015-11-12.pdf

Contact:
info@shrl.eu

 

Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers is a Non-Governmental Organization dedicated to the promotion and protection of human rights and human dignity in Scandinavia and Europe. Scandinavian Human Rights Lawyers implements an effective strategy of advocacy, networking and education on legal issues.